The conditions still do not seem to be in place – the founding leadership of the Revolution is still alive and there are generations that remember the monarchical Iran prior to 1979 – but history teaches us that every system has its appointed hour. Even when you least expect it. Related Erdoğan's Turkey: an elective and autocratic authoritarianism ahmet insel elections without democracy Notes on the Nicaraguan crisis Shelley McConnell Why did Daniel Ortega decide to release and exile the political prisoners? Elvira Cuadra Lira Democratization in Venezuela also involves the reconstruction of the State maryhen jimenez The end of class society? There are two ways to interpret the results of the Italian elections.
The first, which I think will be the most frequented these south africa phone number list days, focuses on the distribution of the vote: rise of the extreme right, weakness of the left, loss of the League, low turnout, etc. The second looks at the far-right victory as part of a longer-term trend dating back to the end of the Cold War. In the end, as will be seen, both interpretations end up coming together, although here I am going to focus mainly on the second, on the political trajectory of Italy in the last 30 years. The thesis that I want to present is very simple: Italy constitutes the most complete, most extreme and earliest example of a general process that is taking place in many European countries with varying degrees of intensity.
Said process consists of the progressive dissolution of the mediating role played by political parties between civil society and the State. When the parties fail to organize political competition, democracy becomes disorganized and enters a phase of turbulence . In Italy the crisis of the parties occurred earlier than anywhere else in Europe. The corruption scandals that came to light in 1992 ( Tangentopoli) blew up the central actor in Italian politics, the Christian Democracy (DC), as well as the parties that orbited around it.